Comparisons of Total Column Ozone Measured by TOMS with Ozone Measured by Ground Stations Data from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) onboard the Nimbus-7 (1978-1993) and Earth Probe (1996-present) satellites have been reprocessed with an improved algorithm. The new algorithm (Version 8) has implemented more accurate instrument calibrations and the following improvements: - New climatological values for temperature and ozone profiles (latitude, altitude and time) - Temperature climatology derived from NCEP - Ozone climatology derived from SAGE & ozonesondes - Uses one wavelength pair (317.5 & 360.0 nm) - Uses a more accurate cloud height climatology derived from NIMBUS-7 Temperature-Humidity Infrared Radiometer - Improved instrument calibration - Improved surface reflectivity model to discriminate between snow and cloud - New aerosol corrections - Implemented sea glint corrections - Improved Radiative Transfer Model - Corrections made for O2-O2 dimer absorption at 360nm - Ring (rotational Raman scattering) correction The following plots show comparisons of total column ozone measured by TOMS and by individual ground stations. Each plot shows a series of three graphs which are the following: - Graph 1: Weekly averaged ozone values (blue=TOMS) - Graph 2: Difference in percent between the TOMS and the ground instrument as calculated by: 100* (TOMS-Ground)/TOMS - Graph 3: Difference in percent between the two measurements as a function of the average of the TOMS & ground station total ozone. The purpose of these plots is to allow the comparison of the performance of individual ozone monitoring instruments with other instruments by using TOMS as a transfer standard. If a sudden change in the difference between TOMS and a single ground station is seen in the time series, the source of the change is most likely the instrument at the ground-station. If many stations observe the same change(s) versus TOMS, the cause would most probably be a change in the TOMS instrument characteristics. The total ozone differences are particularly interesting because they indicate instrument performance issues such as stray light effects and/or instrument nonlinearities. It is hoped that these comparisons can be used to improve the performance of all instruments The ground based data consist of measurements made by Dobson, M83/124 filter ozonemeters and/or Brewer spectrophotmeters. At some stations there have been changes in instrument type (e.g. Dobson to Brewer) and the TOMS data are useful to check continuity. Other stations have more than one instrument operating simultaneously and each ground instrument will have a comparison file in this dataset. The file naming convention is as follows: S### INST .TOMS.pdf Where ### is the 3 digit WMO station number, INST is B for brewer, D for Dobson and F for M83/124 TOMS is either N7 for Nimbus 7 (1978-1993) or EP for Earth Probe (1996-present) Example: s065d.n7.pdf is a pdf file containing the Nimbus-7 TOMS comparisons with the Toronto Dobson. NOTICE: 1) There are no comparisons for the Meteor 3 TOMS (1991-1993) instrument because the Version 8 algorithm has not yet been applied to the M3 dataset. We expect M3 data to be available by summer 2005. 2) The Earth Probe TOMS data from year 2000 onward were processed using a calibration that was stabilized against the NOAA 16 SBUV/2. Because of continuing optical degradation of the EP scan mirror, data after 2002 should not be used in trend studies. There are known latitude dependent errors of -2% to -4% in this period. If there are any questions about these comparisons, please contact: Gordon Labow NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Mail Case 916 Greenbelt, Md 20771 labow@qhearts.gsfc.nasa.gov Richard McPeters NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Mail Case 916 Greenbelt, Md 20771 mcpeters@wrabbit.gsfc.nasa.gov